By Thomas Cavanagh (Assistant Vice President, Distributed Learning, University of Central Florida)
Welcome to the Morning Blend, our occasional blog dedicated to exploring the many facets of blended learning. As time goes on, we hope to use this space to create a forum for ideas related to blended learning from the leading thinkers—both domestic and international—in the field.
Let’s start with the basics. What is blended learning? Quoting from elsewhere on this Blended Learning Toolkit website, “Blended courses (also known as hybrid or mixed-mode courses) are classes where a portion of the traditional face-to-face instruction is replaced by web-based online learning.”
As time goes on, we hope to unpack various models of blending courses, as well as look at some of the nuts and bolts of course construction. For now, however, let’s ask an even more fundamental question than what is blended learning, specifically, why blended learning?
As the NGLC website states, a “2006 American Council on Education study showed that 78% of undergrads worked at least part time while enrolled…These students work an average of 30 hours a week. The economic reality is that many still cannot afford to go to college full-time and when faced with juggling work and school commitments, work often wins out.”
The common mental model of the online learner is an adult, non-traditional student going back to school for a career advancement or change. He/She has work and family responsibilities that interfere with school. Such students need online learning as an essential means of educational access.
Yet, considering the ACE study cited above and observing the behavior of the “traditional” 18-24 year undergraduates here at UCF, I am wondering if the “traditional” label is even relevant anymore. Certainly such students exist. Yet, their numbers continue to decrease. Recently quoted in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Peter J. Stokes, executive vice president of Eduventures, states that only about 15% of students are the typical 18-22-year-olds living in dorms. Another 15% are full-time students of the same age who live off-campus.
That means that 70% of the college-going population is “non-traditional.” And, even the traditional students want non-traditional flexibility. Students who want to be a part of Greek life or participate in intercollegiate athletics or join clubs or otherwise engage in the campus experience can more easily do so via the added flexibility of blended learning.
While gathering information in support of an article about this type of student behavior, we reported that in Fall 2010 8,827 UCF students took both face-to-face and blended classes concurrently. During that same term, approximately 2,700 UCF students took all three modalities of face-to-face, online, and blended courses at the same time.
UCF began its eLearning initiative in the mid-1990s with an exclusive focus on completely online courses and programs. However, within a year we realized that 75% of the students taking online courses were local and also taking traditional, face-to-face courses. Thus, our blended learning initiative was born and the centralized unit created to manage it was dubbed the Center for Distributed Learning (not “Distance Learning”).
What is the experience on your campus? Are you seeing the blurred boundaries of traditional vs. non-traditional and online vs. campus-based students? Feel free to comment below.





7 Comments
Peter Dimock says:
Jul 12, 2011
I teach at the University of Minnesota in a graduate professional program. Many of our students are returning to complete a Master’s degree after many year of working the the field as an undergrad. They lead extremely busy lives and are often working part or even full time in additional to attending on campus classes. We are beginning an initiative to offer blended learning courses as part of the curriculum. There are many obstacles to this effort not the least of which is faculty literacy with online tools and development. In addition, many students are older and not technologically savvy so they have a learning curve to overcome as they begin to experience a new learning environment. As the educational technology coordinator of this effort, I hope to gain from what others have learned along the way.
Karen Levy says:
Jul 15, 2011
You bring up really valid concerns. Having worked at a seminary that offered online courses for Catholic Deacons (average age 62) we ran into this very “digital literacy” question. I created an orientation disc – modularized by the types of assignments they would have throughout the program. Each began with a pre-test – the activity itself – email an attachment, post to the forum discussion … if they could “do – perform” the activity, move on to the next module, if not, here are the instructions with screen captures on how to do…then perform the activity. For some people, this orientation took less than 1/2 hour (one part was to find a proctor) for others, this took a few weeks. But, in the end, they were each prepared – from a technology perspective to fully participate in Master’s level education for their ministries.
Sharon Bittle says:
Jul 28, 2011
I actually attended graduate school at UCF and most of my classess were online. I am a nontraditional student, returning back to school after 25 years. I was not looking forward to the online classes that I took but it was necessary and part of the grant program I was in. I am an educator, work fulltime, and lived 2 hours from the Orlando campus. I had a couple of blended courses and one face-to-face. The online classes were a godsend to me and the one face-toface class was the darkest time. I had to leave work early to drive and then return home about 10:00. I found the face-to-face course interesting as I have been out of school for some time (about 25 years). The conduct of the younger more traditional student was curious. Although it was a face-to-face class, they spent their time sitting in the back row with their computers open surfing the web and “multitasking” during the class.
As a professional developer, I have found that there are various levels of expertise in terms of particpants’ skills in online learning, but I find that there are more and more who are comfortable at our orientations and can easily navigate the online world. I find that I am spending less time with the simple tasks involved in teaching individuals how to access our online platform and more time focusing on the actual activities and objectives of the course.
Kevin Reeve says:
Jul 30, 2011
About 5 years ago I actually ran a report out of our Banner system that showed that the large majority of the fully online students were also taking fully online courses. However as actual degree programs are no available vs just courses, that is shifting. As administration asks for data regarding online vs traditional classes we are finding it very hard to distinguish the two in many cases. Yes a course may be on-campus and meet face-2-face but there are some that could be totally classified as online. They do almost everything online, but do get together face-2-face.
Tony Picciano says:
Aug 5, 2011
I would like to add to this conversation the idea that blended learning will be the future of higher education in this country. In the space of about twenty years we went from essentially 100 percent face-to-face instruction to about 75 percent fully online. Unfortunately we do not have good data on the extent of blended learning in higher education but it is clear that much of what we do will be integrated with technology to deliver some part of most instruction. In ten years we might even see the term “blended learning” become an anachronism. The challenge in 2011 is to make sure that what we do in blended learning is done well. Furthermore, we need to build our research base to document and verify the value of this approach.
Ann Palazzo says:
Oct 1, 2012
I teach both online at one of the largest online colleges in Ohio (Columbus State Community College). Last year I converted one course, Writing Creative Nonfiction (which is currently taught both online and face-to-face) into a blended course. In my experience, it’s the most effective format for my students. I am able to solicit “deep dive” discussions about course readings on our discussion board, but students are also able to experience the spontaneous collaboration of face-to-face workshops. Data at the college indicates that blended courses have a higher rate of success as compared to face-to-face or online courses, but this may be because we’ve been slower and perhaps more methodical and selective in moving to this format.
Ashish Dutt says:
Apr 15, 2013
I taught for an year in a university in Kuala Lumpur while completing my Master’s in Computing. During this time i got interested in tools/interfaces that could enhance the learning skills of both the educator as well as the student. Now after completing my M.Sc, i am searching for a suitable research topic in this field.
My research interest is the usage of technology to develop quality technical courses so as to facilitate employability.
Your suggestions or idea’s are most welcome.